| Title |
Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010019.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hugo Hb Yoo, Vania Santos Nunes-Nogueira, Paulo J Fortes Villas Boas, Cathryn Broderick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 47 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,356,240
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,835
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,836
of 447,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.