↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intermittent versus daily inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Intermittent versus daily inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009611.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan, Caroline Chartrand, Francine M Ducharme

Abstract

Daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the recommended mainstay of treatment in children and adults with persistent asthma. However, often, ICS are used intermittently by patients or recommended by physicians to be used only at the onset of exacerbations.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 298 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Other 21 7%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 106 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 10%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 116 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2015.
All research outputs
#14,972,904
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,938
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,885
of 205,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.