↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intermittent versus daily inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Intermittent versus daily inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009611.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan, Caroline Chartrand, Francine M Ducharme

Abstract

Daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the recommended mainstay of treatment in children and adults with persistent asthma. However, often, ICS are used intermittently by patients or recommended by physicians to be used only at the onset of exacerbations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 279 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Other 20 7%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 92 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 102 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2015.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,770
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,756
of 205,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#157
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.