↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID‐19

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
35 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID‐19
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013639.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Nayaar Islam, Haben Dawit, Jean-Paul Salameh, Sakib Kazi, Nicholas Fabiano, Lee Treanor, Marissa Absi, Faraz Ahmad, Paul Rooprai, Ahmed Al Khalil, Kelly Harper, Neil Kamra, Mariska MG Leeflang, Lotty Hooft, Christian B Pol, Ross Prager, Samanjit S Hare, Carole Dennie, René Spijker, Jonathan J Deeks, Jacqueline Dinnes, Kevin Jenniskens, Daniël A Korevaar, Jérémie F Cohen, Ann Van den Bruel, Yemisi Takwoingi, Janneke de Wijgert, Junfeng Wang, Elena Pena, Sandra Sabongui, Matthew DF McInnes, Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 190 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Other 9 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 92 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Unspecified 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 96 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,099,724
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,092
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,834
of 450,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.