| Title |
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID‐19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013639.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Nayaar Islam, Haben Dawit, Jean-Paul Salameh, Sakib Kazi, Nicholas Fabiano, Lee Treanor, Marissa Absi, Faraz Ahmad, Paul Rooprai, Ahmed Al Khalil, Kelly Harper, Neil Kamra, Mariska MG Leeflang, Lotty Hooft, Christian B Pol, Ross Prager, Samanjit S Hare, Carole Dennie, René Spijker, Jonathan J Deeks, Jacqueline Dinnes, Kevin Jenniskens, Daniël A Korevaar, Jérémie F Cohen, Ann Van den Bruel, Yemisi Takwoingi, Janneke de Wijgert, Junfeng Wang, Elena Pena, Sandra Sabongui, Matthew DF McInnes, Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| Mexico | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 20% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 93 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 97 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,075,482
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,153
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,490
of 448,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.