↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative interventions for treating hyperextension injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Conservative interventions for treating hyperextension injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009030.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joelle Chalmer, Megan Blakeway, Zoe Adams, Stephen J Milan

Abstract

Immobilisation and early motion (protected or unrestricted) are both used following hyperextension injuries to the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the finger.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 125 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 22%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 9 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 35 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Psychology 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 40 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,830,692
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,261
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,602
of 205,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#198
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.