↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic suburethral tape surgery in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic suburethral tape surgery in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009407.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evangelia Bakali, Brian S Buckley, Paul Hilton, Douglas G Tincello

Abstract

Surgery is a common treatment modality for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), usually offered for women who fail conservative treatments. Suburethral tapes have superseded colposuspension because cure rates are comparable and recovery time reduced. However, some women will not be cured after suburethral tape surgery, and currently there is no consensus on how to manage these women.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Psychology 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#6,656,891
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,024
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,788
of 142,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.