The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and amikacin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014841.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha Pillay, Karen R Steingart, Geraint R Davies, Marty Chaplin, Margaretha De Vos, Samuel G Schumacher, Rob Warren, Grant Theron |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Greece | 1 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 70 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 72 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,713,363
of 26,222,113 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,500
of 13,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,180
of 448,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.