| Title |
Topical clonidine for neuropathic pain in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010967.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wojciech T Serednicki, Anna Wrzosek, Jaroslaw Woron, Jaroslaw Garlicki, Jan Dobrogowski, Joanna Jakowicka-Wordliczek, Jerzy Wordliczek, Renata Zajaczkowska |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 2 | 15% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 18 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,337,231
of 24,002,307 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,087
of 12,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,505
of 429,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,002,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.