↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013259.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte Jl Molenaar, Stefan J van Rooijen, Hugo Jp Fokkenrood, Rudi Mh Roumen, Loes Janssen, Gerrit D Slooter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 71 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 79 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,211,754
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,545
of 11,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,506
of 436,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.