↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013259.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte JL Molenaar, Stefan J van Rooijen, Hugo JP Fokkenrood, Rudi MH Roumen, Loes Janssen, Gerrit D Slooter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 24%
Unspecified 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 6 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,484,722
of 21,714,585 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,489
of 12,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,675
of 333,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,714,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.