↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia in rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia in rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000332.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arturo J Martí-Carvajal, Luis H Agreda-Pérez, Ivan Solà

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and systemic inflammatory disorder that mainly affects the small joints of the hands and feet. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents have been used to treat anemia, one of the extra-articular manifestations of RA. Although anemia is less of a problem now because of the reduction in inflammation due to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), it could still be an issue in countries where DMARDs are not yet accessible.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Psychology 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 34 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#973,113
of 17,067,437 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,583
of 11,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,873
of 157,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,067,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.