| Title |
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011535.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emilie Sbidian, Anna Chaimani, Ignacio Garcia-Doval, Liz Doney, Corinna Dressler, Camille Hua, Carolyn Hughes, Luigi Naldi, Sivem Afach, Laurence Le Cleach |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 13% |
| Germany | 4 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 272 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 33 | 12% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 54 | 20% |
| Unknown | 79 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 34 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 16% |
| Unknown | 86 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,078,379
of 24,278,128 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,304
of 12,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,066
of 429,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,278,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.