| Title |
Antibiotic prophylaxis for corneal abrasion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014617.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abdullah M Algarni, Gordon H Guyatt, Angus Turner, Saad Alamri |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,558,218
of 24,512,028 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,470
of 12,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,123
of 431,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,512,028 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.