↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004434.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Liu, Junmin Chen, Yanqiu Gao, Bao Deng, Kunshen Liu

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease, which leads to right heart failure and premature death. Recent evidence suggests that endothelin receptor antagonists may be promising drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Unknown 134 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Other 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 37 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2013.
All research outputs
#5,317,014
of 16,650,161 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,013
of 11,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,290
of 155,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,650,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.