↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004434.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Liu, Junmin Chen, Yanqiu Gao, Bao Deng, Kunshen Liu

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease, which leads to right heart failure and premature death. Recent evidence suggests that endothelin receptor antagonists may be promising drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Other 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 37 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,429,756
of 19,825,709 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,494
of 11,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,432
of 166,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,825,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.