| Title |
Interventions for preventing falls in Parkinson's disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011574.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie E Allen, Colleen G Canning, Lorena Rosa S Almeida, Bastiaan R Bloem, Samyra Hj Keus, Niklas Löfgren, Alice Nieuwboer, Geert Saf Verheyden, Tiê P Yamato, Catherine Sherrington |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 15% |
| Australia | 15 | 12% |
| United States | 11 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 52 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 66% |
| Scientists | 28 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Researcher | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 97 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 18 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 102 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#433,098
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#753
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,527
of 449,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.