↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
49 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic: a scoping review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzie Kratzer, Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Renke L Biallas, Robin Featherstone, Carmen Klinger, Ani Movsisyan, Julia E Rabe, Julia Stadelmaier, Eva Rehfuess, Katharina Wabnitz, Ben Verboom

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 23 14%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 66 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Unspecified 23 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 73 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#958,792
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,879
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,762
of 448,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.