The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015397 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzie Kratzer, Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Renke L Biallas, Robin Featherstone, Carmen Klinger, Ani Movsisyan, Julia E Rabe, Julia Stadelmaier, Eva Rehfuess, Katharina Wabnitz, Ben Verboom |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 6 | 13% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 77% |
| Scientists | 6 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 83 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,017,891
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,889
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,718
of 453,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.