↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Adjunctive steroid therapy versus antibiotics alone for acute endophthalmitis after intraocular procedure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Adjunctive steroid therapy versus antibiotics alone for acute endophthalmitis after intraocular procedure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012131.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Emami, Ken Kitayama, Anne L Coleman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 14 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 15 60%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,139,177
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,607
of 12,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,922
of 442,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.