The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Digital interventions to improve adherence to maintenance medication in asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013030.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy Chan, Anna De Simoni, Vari Wileman, Lois Holliday, Chris J Newby, Claudia Chisari, Sana Ali, Natalee Zhu, Prathima Padakanti, Vasita Pinprachanan, Victoria Ting, Chris J Griffiths |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 16% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 83 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 88 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#337,450
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#549
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,091
of 451,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.