↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaccines for preventing influenza in people with asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Vaccines for preventing influenza in people with asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000364.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Cates, Brian H Rowe

Abstract

Influenza vaccination is recommended for asthmatic patients in many countries as observational studies have shown that influenza infection can be associated with asthma exacerbations. However, influenza vaccination has the potential to cause wheezing and adversely affect pulmonary function. While an overview concluded that there was no clear benefit of influenza vaccination in patients with asthma, this conclusion was not based on a systematic search of the literature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Estonia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 290 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 15%
Researcher 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Other 18 6%
Other 53 18%
Unknown 98 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 8%
Psychology 8 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 103 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#771,393
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,422
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,066
of 206,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.