↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise versus airway clearance techniques for people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Exercise versus airway clearance techniques for people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013285.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie D Heinz, Adam Walsh, Kevin W Southern, Zoe Johnstone, Kate H Regan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Unspecified 7 8%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 3%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 43 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Unspecified 7 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 45 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,514,575
of 25,048,615 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,301
of 13,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,594
of 434,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,048,615 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.