| Title |
Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000190.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Busaba Chuatrakoon, Sothida Nantakool, Amaraporn Rerkasem, Saritphat Orrapin, Dominic Pj Howard, Kittipan Rerkasem |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 26% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,488,188
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,854
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,142
of 448,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.