| Title |
Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000190.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Busaba Chuatrakoon, Sothida Nantakool, Amaraporn Rerkasem, Saritphat Orrapin, Dominic PJ Howard, Kittipan Rerkasem |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 25% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,801,912
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,328
of 12,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,723
of 441,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.