| Title |
Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011775.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerryann Walsh, Elizabeth Eggins, Lorelei Hine, Ben Mathews, Maureen C Kenny, Sarah Howard, Natasha Ayling, Elizabeth Dallaston, Elizabeth Pink, Dimitrios Vagenas |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Spain | 4 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 80% |
| Scientists | 8 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 48 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 49 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,473,309
of 24,554,073 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,275
of 12,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,694
of 426,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,554,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.