↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Herbal medicines for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Herbal medicines for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004116.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Ping Liu, Min Yang, Yunxia Liu, Mao Ling Wei, Sameline Grimsgaard

Abstract

Traditional herbal therapies have been used for a long time to treat gastrointestinal disorders including irritable bowel syndrome, and their effectiveness from clinical research evidence needs to be systematically reviewed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
Unknown 195 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 25%
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 47 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 55 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,255,200
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,806
of 12,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,305
of 154,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.