https://t.co/ca9ToFN45v WHOの基準でacceptable or desirableな抗原定性検査キットとして、以下の7種。 Abbott ‐ BinaxNOW COVID‐19 Ag card 感度80.9% 特異度99.9% 2, 018検体 BIONOTE – NowCheck 感度89.5% 特異度97.7% 2, 618検体 Denka Co – QuickNavi 感度84.2% 特異度100% 1, 633 検体
https://t.co/ca9ToFN45v コクランでは、Abbott, BIONOTE, Denka Co, LumiraDx, SD Biosensor/Roche をWHO acceptable performance standardsを満たしているとしているとのこと。MologicとSiemensもacceptable or desirableとしている。 https://t.co/Vsf4JLV1eh
RT @emeraldtyger: @FirmiSmo Let’s not pretend these tests are super accurate though, eh. https://t.co/45jMZpXxZk
@FirmiSmo Let’s not pretend these tests are super accurate though, eh. https://t.co/45jMZpXxZk
Les tests antigeniques, c'est seulement 55% de positivité chez les asymptomatiques, en gros pile ou face! Et c'est ce que est préconiser par certaines personnes pour le retour des soignants non vaccinés: la loterie. Belle politique publique de santé https:
@DrEricDing @UL0VET @dianaberrent "if 1000 people with symptoms had the antigen test, and 50 (5%) of them really had COVID-19: ... 955 people would test negative for COVID-19. Of these, 10 people (1.0%) would actually have COVID-19 (false negative result).
@KRRuhri @fdpbt Bei Testung von Personen ohne Symptome erfolgt nur in 55 % ein korrektes Ergebnis. Deshalb ist der Vergleich unzutreffend. https://t.co/j6xGr9Emkp
@Jusrangers Their testing will result in almost as many false positives as real positives. And it would take 30,000 tests!!! to produce 30 asymptomatic positives w/ this 3 test advice depending on community transmission levels. https://t.co/7rPoFcoNBL ht
@an4ke @nadia_buiter Sneltesten hebben altijd ongeveer een kwart van pcr positieven gemist... https://t.co/EEr9Cs8BQy
@Andrew_Ervin @theresafromwpg I don’t know where you’d have heard that but recent studies place accuracy of rapid antigen tests at nearly 100% accuracy. https://t.co/XpHQ8DQglf
@TBunio @theresafromwpg This cochrane review suggests 45% to roughly 2/3rds. Where are you getting 10%? https://t.co/HX0DQXx0mi.
@NURSEKPETE @angelacrazygirl False narrative results are far less common than false positives https://t.co/oXS1tLewLa https://t.co/Wf3YhbeCfW
@matthewdmarsden I’d suggest not relying on information from someone with a clear political agenda. Her ‘data’ is severely flawed. Legitimate (i.e. non-political) case studies show false positives at 11% and false negatives less than 2%. https://t.co/Z9u7D
RT @vickdimin: Όλη η απάτη με τα τελείως αναξιόπιστα τεστ που έβγαζαν θετικό ό,τι πετούσε και την "ασυμπτωματική" νόσηση. Επιστημονική κ πο…
Όλη η απάτη με τα τελείως αναξιόπιστα τεστ που έβγαζαν θετικό ό,τι πετούσε και την "ασυμπτωματική" νόσηση. Επιστημονική κ πολιτική αλητεία που ακόμα έχει (ευτυχώς λιγότερους) υποστηρικτές.👇#covid19 #εμβολιο #κρουσματα
@Jcluster2 Or you are in the large minority. "In people with confirmed COVID-19, antigen tests correctly identified COVID-19 infection in an average of 73% of people with symptoms, compared to 55% of people without symptoms. " From https://t.co/MQ37U6BwsJ
RT @EvidenceAid: Read our summary of the second update of the Cochrane review of rapid tests for SARS‐CoV‐2, published in July 2022 #COVID1…
Read our summary of the second update of the Cochrane review of rapid tests for SARS‐CoV‐2, published in July 2022 #COVID19 #CochraneLibrary! https://t.co/zbiJsPdGid https://t.co/qFnTSucFQn
Plus, Antigen tests, as Mitch should know, are not foolproof in detecting infection, and he probably should have scheduled a PCR test, since he's hellbent on interacting with every single media outlet known to man at this critical moment. https://t.co/oNj8
RT @Schmidtlepp: Und mir ist klar, dass sie bei asymptomatischen Fällen nicht so gut funktionieren, aber es ist halt besser als nichts und…
Und mir ist klar, dass sie bei asymptomatischen Fällen nicht so gut funktionieren, aber es ist halt besser als nichts und man bekäme die Infektionszahlen signifikant gesenkt. https://t.co/l6qaRlE98y
@VeilletteAndre 73% de taux de détection parmi les symptomatiques positifs au PCR selon cette étude. Je crois avoir pris la bonne décision de m’isoler 10 jours le mois dernier lorsque j’ai eu plusieurs symptômes forts malgré des RATs négatifs. https://t.co
Apparently false positive antigen COVID tests are a thing! I will go get a PCR test tomorrow and otherwise isolate. https://t.co/OFk2tSl6dD)
@PhilHollowayEsq @thevivafrei @AlbertBourla Well, as it turns out, there is an answer to my question. The rapid antigen test is HIGHLY INACCURATE when administered to people w/o symptoms. Source: https://t.co/F65ZFK2vRw
RT @CochraneLibrary: #CochranePodcast - How accurate are rapid antigen tests for diagnosing #COVID19? 🎧 Listen: https://t.co/RZoKIpoZPU A…
#CochranePodcast - How accurate are rapid antigen tests for diagnosing #COVID19? 🎧 Listen: https://t.co/RZoKIpoZPU Also on @Spotify & @ApplePodcasts 🤓 Read the full @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/3sWQwO1NYt https://t.co/LdNPAcrKNk
RT @SACochrane: Updated review looks at how accurate rapid, point-of-care antigen tests are for diagnosing COVID-19. https://t.co/Ewyuwx3Vj…
Updated review looks at how accurate rapid, point-of-care antigen tests are for diagnosing COVID-19. https://t.co/Ewyuwx3Vjp @CochraneAfrica @cebhc @Cochrane_IDG #Read-It
RT @FvRhijn: Voor iedereen die het nog even horen moet: als je klachten hebt en je zelftest is negatief, please haal een pcr of blijf thuis…
RT @FvRhijn: Voor iedereen die het nog even horen moet: als je klachten hebt en je zelftest is negatief, please haal een pcr of blijf thuis…
Voor iedereen die het nog even horen moet: als je klachten hebt en je zelftest is negatief, please haal een pcr of blijf thuis! De sensitiviteit is ~74%... https://t.co/EEr9Cs8410
@NL_Wetenschap Beterschap! Al een pcr gehaald? In people with confirmed COVID-19, antigen tests correctly identified COVID-19 infection in an average of 73% of people with symptoms, compared to 55% of people without symptoms. https://t.co/EEr9Cs8410
@Martin_Sauer @LippBraaz @AllesWahnsinn Für eine nüchterne Analyse: https://t.co/tS6laMFhl0 Wenn man das mit der momentanen Inzidenz verrechnet, kann man leicht überschlagen, wieviele Tests es für eine erfolgreiche Detektion braucht.
RT @CochraneIberoam: ¿Son fiables las pruebas rápidas para diagnosticar la covid‐19? Una nueva revisión @Cochrane_IDG concluye que algunas…
Quelle est la précision des tests antigéniques rapides dans le diagnostic de la COVID-19 ? | Cochrane https://t.co/UNSta4Suky
@dxtrrl @InsiteVFX @SwornRL https://t.co/jDmcDTZQnQ. Rapid antigen tests are *not* well suited to identifying COVID in asymptomatic patients, and of the positive cases identified as such, up to 48% are false positives.
@Sparrowhawk_4 @RealTriHouse @SwornRL https://t.co/jDmcDTZQnQ. Under "Key Messages": Rapid antigen tests are considerably less accurate when they are used in people with no signs or symptoms of infection, but do perform better in people who have been in c
@eberry_photog @Sprite__RL @Thalo211 @wiickkeddd @SwornRL @FrowzySquirrel Here is a link to the analysis I am referring to: https://t.co/jDmcDTINlQ.
Quelle est la précision des tests antigéniques rapides dans le diagnostic de la COVID-19 ? https://t.co/SnWl3nIRzg
RT @kosuke_yasukawa: 抗原検査だとざっくり約3割、PCRだと約2割くらい偽陰性に出ることがあり、症状の有無や検査をした時期によって変化します。症状がない時期での検査は特に偽陰性が多くなります。 https://t.co/ZZawQenvev https://…
RT @CochraneAT: Update eines Cochrane Reviews zu Antigen-Schnelltests, um eine Infektion mit COVID-19 nachzuweisen: Die Empfindlichkeit der…
Update eines Cochrane Reviews zu Antigen-Schnelltests, um eine Infektion mit COVID-19 nachzuweisen: Die Empfindlichkeit der Tests variiert, bei symptomatischen Personen sind die Ergebnisse am genauesten, unabhängige Evidenz fehlt bei vielen Schnelltests.
RT @erickmeinardogp: Pruebas rápidas en el lugar de la atención para el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS‐CoV‐2 - Dinnes, J - 2022 | Coc…
Pruebas rápidas en el lugar de la atención para el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS‐CoV‐2 - Dinnes, J - 2022 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/cKtMEWJq5o
@65sneaky @WorldofNC Sure, I have evidence for my beliefs "correctly identified COVID-19 infection in an average of 73% of people with symptoms" https://t.co/z9FpCIuByA We do choose who we believe, but if we deny evidence we are denying ourselves the t
RT @Saludteca: Pruebas rápidas en el lugar de la atención para el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/ThwdW7UYNg 😷La s…
@Ing_Torta Bueno tampoco estuve bien ahi https://t.co/TLSaSJU54n Pero si, hay bastante posibilidad de falso negativo
ふむ
RT @kosuke_yasukawa: 抗原検査だとざっくり約3割、PCRだと約2割くらい偽陰性に出ることがあり、症状の有無や検査をした時期によって変化します。症状がない時期での検査は特に偽陰性が多くなります。 https://t.co/ZZawQenvev https://…
RT @Impf_Info: Und dann sind viele der Tests auch noch nicht mal qualitätsgesichert.... #niemalswieder https://t.co/HSe0QcoGX0 https://t…
RT @Impf_Info: Und dann sind viele der Tests auch noch nicht mal qualitätsgesichert.... #niemalswieder https://t.co/HSe0QcoGX0 https://t…
RT @3Annoyed: https://t.co/5ziOspk8Cl @tatiann69922625 @AnneliseBocquet @ARadlerPohlDr @SueChappel @Notarzt12 What was done to the kids?…
RT @Impf_Info: Und dann sind viele der Tests auch noch nicht mal qualitätsgesichert.... #niemalswieder https://t.co/HSe0QcoGX0 https://t…
RT @Impf_Info: Und dann sind viele der Tests auch noch nicht mal qualitätsgesichert.... #niemalswieder https://t.co/HSe0QcoGX0 https://t…
RT @Impf_Info: Und dann sind viele der Tests auch noch nicht mal qualitätsgesichert.... #niemalswieder https://t.co/HSe0QcoGX0 https://t…
RT @Impf_Info: Und dann sind viele der Tests auch noch nicht mal qualitätsgesichert.... #niemalswieder https://t.co/HSe0QcoGX0 https://t…
RT @Impf_Info: Und dann sind viele der Tests auch noch nicht mal qualitätsgesichert.... #niemalswieder https://t.co/HSe0QcoGX0 https://t…
Und dann sind viele der Tests auch noch nicht mal qualitätsgesichert.... #niemalswieder https://t.co/HSe0QcoGX0 https://t.co/04TAd94or0 2⃣
@JavaBatCohen @SativusRaphanus @Manolotabaiba1 @farmafilico @SorayaAssef1 @NuevoParadigma3 @natho47 @ministeriosalud @FLMlRONES @marcomorareyes @APSIINCHILE 99,6/99,7% especificidad en este: https://t.co/hsdtIs6AYw
RT @cochrane_nz: How accurate are rapid antigen tests for diagnosing COVID-19? Check out this new Cochrane review. https://t.co/q3JMONq6UB…
How accurate are rapid antigen tests for diagnosing COVID-19? Check out this new Cochrane review. https://t.co/q3JMONq6UB https://t.co/oMxONNZ7Dd
@Studio8502 Best 3 out of 4? 5 out of 7? I've had a positive then 3 negatives before, as the reverse. When you hit the positive rapid, the only way to "know" is to hit the clinic for the real one. The false pos/neg on the rapid tests is almost laugha
RT @CochraneNursing: When it comes to diagnosing #COVID19, how accurate are rapid antigen tests?😷 A recent #Cochrane Review examined the la…
RT @CochraneLibrary: ❓ How accurate are rapid antigen tests for diagnosing #COVID19? Updated @Cochrane_IDG systematic review looks at evide…
RT @CochraneNursing: When it comes to diagnosing #COVID19, how accurate are rapid antigen tests?😷 A recent #Cochrane Review examined the la…
RT @CochraneNursing: When it comes to diagnosing #COVID19, how accurate are rapid antigen tests?😷 A recent #Cochrane Review examined the la…
🦠 “Rapid antigen tests are most accurate when they are used in people who have signs or symptoms of COVID‐19, especially during the first week of illness. People who test negative may still be infected.”
❓ How accurate are rapid antigen tests for diagnosing #COVID19? Updated @Cochrane_IDG systematic review looks at evidence from 155 studies. https://t.co/3sWQwO1NYt https://t.co/VUkq1aQ3n4
RT @Cochrane_IDG: Updated @Cochrane_IDG review 'Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection' https://t.co/jZXT…
RT @Saludteca: Pruebas rápidas en el lugar de la atención para el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/ThwdW7UYNg 😷La s…
Pruebas rápidas en el lugar de la atención para el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/ThwdW7UYNg 😷La sensibilidad de las pruebas de antígeno varía 😷En las personas con signos y síntomas de covid‐19, las sensibilidades son más altas en
RT @CochraneIberoam: ¿Son fiables las pruebas rápidas para diagnosticar la covid‐19? Una nueva revisión @Cochrane_IDG concluye que algunas…
RT @CochraneNursing: When it comes to diagnosing #COVID19, how accurate are rapid antigen tests?😷 A recent #Cochrane Review examined the la…
RT @CochraneNursing: When it comes to diagnosing #COVID19, how accurate are rapid antigen tests?😷 A recent #Cochrane Review examined the la…
When it comes to diagnosing #COVID19, how accurate are rapid antigen tests?😷 A recent #Cochrane Review examined the latest evidence, which included 155 studies. 👉🏼https://t.co/qf5aC52Nmg @CochraneLibrary @CochraneNursing #CochraneHongKong #EvidenceforNursi
RT @CochraneIberoam: ¿Son fiables las pruebas rápidas para diagnosticar la covid‐19? Una nueva revisión @Cochrane_IDG concluye que algunas…
RT @CochraneIberoam: ¿Son fiables las pruebas rápidas para diagnosticar la covid‐19? Una nueva revisión @Cochrane_IDG concluye que algunas…
RT @CochraneIberoam: ¿Son fiables las pruebas rápidas para diagnosticar la covid‐19? Una nueva revisión @Cochrane_IDG concluye que algunas…
RT @CochraneIberoam: ¿Son fiables las pruebas rápidas para diagnosticar la covid‐19? Una nueva revisión @Cochrane_IDG concluye que algunas…
RT @CochraneIberoam: ¿Son fiables las pruebas rápidas para diagnosticar la covid‐19? Una nueva revisión @Cochrane_IDG concluye que algunas…
How accurate are rapid antigen tests for diagnosing COVID-19? https://t.co/lB0mxbJUZS
¿Son fiables las pruebas rápidas para diagnosticar la covid‐19? Una nueva revisión @Cochrane_IDG concluye que algunas pruebas de antígenos pueden sustituir a la RT‐PCR en personas con síntomas, pero se necesita más evidencia en personas sin síntomas htt
Pruebas rápidas en el lugar de la atención para el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS‐CoV‐2 - Dinnes, J - 2022 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/7vlfIPwWXG https://t.co/8n0LE8WYkU
Updated @Cochrane_IDG review 'Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection' https://t.co/jZXTqmFKad Evidence for testing in asymptomatic cohorts has⬆️but sensitivity is lower. Paucity of evidence for testing in different setti
RT @SarahChapman30: Also "The accuracy of rapid antigen tests varies between tests that are produced by different manufacturers and there i…
RT @SarahChapman30: Rapid antigen tests (LFTs) - most accurate for people with signs/symptoms of COVID‐19, esp in 1st week of illness - l…
Also "The accuracy of rapid antigen tests varies between tests that are produced by different manufacturers and there is a lack of evidence for many commercially available tests." Newly updated Cochrane Review from @Cochrane_IDG https://t.co/9f7pZPIisc
Rapid antigen tests (LFTs) - most accurate for people with signs/symptoms of COVID‐19, esp in 1st week of illness - less accurate if no signs/symptoms but better in known contacts of someone with COVID - people who test negative may still be infected h