↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
32 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1453 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002213.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott Reeves, Laure Perrier, Joanne Goldman, Della Freeth, Merrick Zwarenstein

Abstract

The delivery of effective, high-quality patient care is a complex activity. It demands health and social care professionals collaborate in an effective manner. Research continues to suggest that collaboration between these professionals can be problematic. Interprofessional education (IPE) offers a possible way to improve interprofessional collaboration and patient care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 1425 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 211 15%
Student > Bachelor 192 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 132 9%
Researcher 120 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 80 6%
Other 373 26%
Unknown 345 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 388 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 296 20%
Social Sciences 110 8%
Psychology 87 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 32 2%
Other 163 11%
Unknown 377 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,321,686
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,811
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,893
of 210,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.