↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
32 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1480 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002213.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott Reeves, Laure Perrier, Joanne Goldman, Della Freeth, Merrick Zwarenstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 1452 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 216 15%
Student > Bachelor 193 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 134 9%
Researcher 120 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 80 5%
Other 376 25%
Unknown 361 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 388 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 300 20%
Social Sciences 112 8%
Psychology 87 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 33 2%
Other 167 11%
Unknown 393 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,347,256
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,724
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,987
of 211,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.