| Title |
Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002213.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott Reeves, Laure Perrier, Joanne Goldman, Della Freeth, Merrick Zwarenstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 31% |
| Canada | 4 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 69% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,470 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1442 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 211 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 192 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 132 | 9% |
| Researcher | 120 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 80 | 5% |
| Other | 390 | 27% |
| Unknown | 345 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 388 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 299 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 110 | 7% |
| Psychology | 87 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 33 | 2% |
| Other | 176 | 12% |
| Unknown | 377 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,340,762
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,824
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,075
of 214,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.