↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus alternative treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Extracorporeal photopheresis versus alternative treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009898.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathrin Buder, Matthias Zirngibl, Sascha Bapistella, Joerg J Meerpohl, Brigitte Strahm, Dirk Bassler, Marcus Weitz

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,039,117
of 24,495,755 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,762
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,415
of 435,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,495,755 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.