↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus alternative treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Extracorporeal photopheresis versus alternative treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009898.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathrin Buder, Matthias Zirngibl, Sascha Bapistella, Joerg J Meerpohl, Brigitte Strahm, Dirk Bassler, Marcus Weitz

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,112,008
of 21,859,856 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,754
of 12,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,150
of 265,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,859,856 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.