| Title |
Stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011819.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastian Bruera, Harish Sidanmat, Donald A Molony, Maureen D Mayes, Maria E Suarez-Almazor, Kate Krause, Maria Angeles Lopez-Olivo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Colombia | 3 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 24% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 26% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,220,242
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,571
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,289
of 432,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.