| Title |
Parenting interventions for the prevention of unintentional injuries in childhood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006020.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Denise Kendrick, Caroline A Mulvaney, Lily Ye, Tony Stevens, Julie A Mytton, Sarah Stewart-Brown |
| Abstract |
Parent education and training programmes can improve maternal psychosocial health, child behavioural problems and parenting practices. This review assesses the effects of parenting interventions for reducing child injury. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 334 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 16% |
| Researcher | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 61 | 18% |
| Unknown | 86 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 15% |
| Psychology | 41 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 7% |
| Unknown | 101 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,681,553
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,701
of 13,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,953
of 202,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.