↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Impact of low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer‐related mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
51 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Impact of low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer‐related mortality
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013829.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asha Bonney, Reem Malouf, Corynne Marchal, David Manners, Kwun M Fong, Henry M Marshall, Louis B Irving, Renée Manser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 7%
Other 10 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Student > Master 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 100 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 108 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#694,480
of 25,528,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,294
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,829
of 432,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,528,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.