The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Impact of low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer‐related mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013829.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asha Bonney, Reem Malouf, Corynne Marchal, David Manners, Kwun M Fong, Henry M Marshall, Louis B Irving, Renée Manser |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Syrian Arab Republic | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 76% |
| Scientists | 6 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 201 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 116 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 125 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#736,183
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,296
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,531
of 437,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.