| Title |
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints of older people in general hospital settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012476.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jens Abraham, Julian Hirt, Christin Richter, Sascha Köpke, Gabriele Meyer, Ralph Möhler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 81% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 3% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 74 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 75 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,101,064
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,261
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,749
of 430,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.