Title |
Preprocedural mouth rinses for preventing transmission of infectious diseases through aerosols in dental healthcare providers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013826.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj, Prashanti Eachempati, Martha Paisi, Mona Nasser, Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, Tony Francis, Jos H Verbeek |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
United States | 2 | 6% |
Spain | 2 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
Papua New Guinea | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 19 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 85% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 7% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 45 | 65% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 46 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,145,783
of 24,373,273 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,499
of 12,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,526
of 419,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,373,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.