↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
57 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012337.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Todhunter-Brown, Christine Hazelton, Pauline Campbell, Andrew Elders, Suzanne Hagen, Doreen McClurg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 207 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Student > Master 14 7%
Unspecified 9 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 113 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Unspecified 8 4%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 119 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#894,079
of 26,170,906 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,625
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,452
of 436,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,170,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.