↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
57 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012337.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Todhunter-Brown, Christine Hazelton, Pauline Campbell, Andrew Elders, Suzanne Hagen, Doreen McClurg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 10%
Unspecified 19 9%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 104 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 12%
Unspecified 21 10%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 109 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#877,906
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,642
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,225
of 433,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.