The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Adding rapid diagnostic tests to community‐based programmes for treating malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009527.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth N Allen, Alison Beriliy Wiyeh, Michael McCaul |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 53 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,170,237
of 26,170,906 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,413
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,581
of 437,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,170,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.