↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chemotherapy and supportive care versus supportive care alone for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Chemotherapy and supportive care versus supportive care alone for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007309.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group

Abstract

Since our individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of supportive care and chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), published in 1995, many trials have been completed. We have carried out an updated IPD meta-analysis to assess newer regimens and determine conclusively the effect of chemotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 8 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 37 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,691,711
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,811
of 11,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,254
of 103,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.