↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chemotherapy and supportive care versus supportive care alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Chemotherapy and supportive care versus supportive care alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007309.pub2
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Since our individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of supportive care and chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), published in 1995, many trials have been completed. We have carried out an updated IPD meta-analysis to assess newer regimens and determine conclusively the effect of chemotherapy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 6 6%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 20 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,976,021
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,627
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,542
of 161,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.