The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Water for wound cleansing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003861.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ritin Fernandez, Heidi L Green, Rhonda Griffiths, Ross A Atkinson, Laura J Ellwood |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Japan | 2 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
Jamaica | 1 | 2% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 37 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 42 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Scientists | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 201 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 19 | 9% |
Researcher | 15 | 7% |
Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
Unspecified | 13 | 6% |
Other | 41 | 20% |
Unknown | 86 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 14% |
Unspecified | 13 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 4% |
Unknown | 91 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2024.
All research outputs
#845,065
of 26,557,556 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,492
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,413
of 440,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.