The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eila ES Sailas, Mark Fenton |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 239 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 15% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 25% |
| Unknown | 55 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 26% |
| Psychology | 39 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 66 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,978,184
of 26,364,993 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,569
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,586
of 114,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,364,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.