↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
17 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
276 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
Title
Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eila ES Sailas, Mark Fenton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 185 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 51 26%
Unknown 29 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 28%
Psychology 39 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 14%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 39 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,484,726
of 18,771,444 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,624
of 11,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,519
of 168,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,771,444 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.