| Title |
Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002106.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason Wasiak, Heather Cleland, Fiona Campbell, Anneliese Spinks |
| Abstract |
An acute burn wound is a complex and evolving injury. Extensive burns produce systemic consequences, in addition to local tissue damage. Treatment of partial thickness burn wounds is directed towards promoting healing and a wide variety of dressings are currently available. Improvements in technology and advances in understanding of wound healing have driven the development of new dressings. Dressing selection should be based on their effects on healing, but ease of application and removal, dressing change requirements, cost and patient comfort should also be considered. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 11% |
| Iceland | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 509 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 492 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 12% |
| Researcher | 52 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 110 | 22% |
| Unknown | 144 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 192 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Engineering | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 66 | 13% |
| Unknown | 165 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,011,431
of 24,138,997 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,404
of 12,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,387
of 200,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,138,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.