↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Danazol for unexplained subfertility

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Danazol for unexplained subfertility
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000069.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

E Hughes, J Brown, G Tiffin, P Vandekerckhove

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 17 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 17 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,515,171
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,605
of 12,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,124
of 173,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.