↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015048.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Bryant, Shaun Hiu, Patience T Kunonga, Ketankumar Gajjar, Dawn Craig, Luke Vale, Brett A Winter-Roach, Ahmed Elattar, Raj Naik

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 38%
Unspecified 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,052,588
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,702
of 12,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,402
of 434,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.