The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Electromagnetic‐guided versus endoscopic‐guided postpyloric placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013865.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jun Watanabe, Eiichi Kakehi, Masaru Okamoto, Shizukiyo Ishikawa, Yuki Kataoka |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#21,316,883
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,289
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328,704
of 444,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.