↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Omega‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
252 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
383 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Omega‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003205.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janine Hartweg, Rafael Perera, Victor M Montori, Sean F Dinneen, Andrew HAWN Neil, Andrew J Farmer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 375 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 16%
Researcher 49 13%
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 10%
Other 21 5%
Other 80 21%
Unknown 89 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 145 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 2%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 102 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#907,438
of 26,071,599 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,660
of 13,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,466
of 171,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,071,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.