↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for pathological gambling

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for pathological gambling
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001521.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Oakley‐Browne, Peter Adams, Peta Mobberley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 82 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 24 27%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Unspecified 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,299,208
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,815
of 12,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,433
of 112,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.