The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Reconstructive surgery for treating pressure ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012032.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gill Norman, Jason Kf Wong, Kavit Amin, Jo C Dumville, Susy Pramod |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 57% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 72 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 78 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,383,620
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,757
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,007
of 443,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.