| Title |
Antihistamines for motion sickness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012715.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadine Karrim, Ryan Byrne, Nombulelo Magula, Yougan Saman |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 8 | 14% |
| Japan | 7 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 31 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#440,561
of 24,490,209 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#795
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,173
of 433,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,490,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.