↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Systemic corticosteroids for radicular and non-radicular low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Systemic corticosteroids for radicular and non-radicular low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012450.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger Chou, Rafael Zambelli Pinto, Rongwei Fu, Robert A Lowe, Nicholas Henschke, James H McAuley, Tracy Dana

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 11 39%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 12 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,767,335
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,963
of 12,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,355
of 442,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.