| Title |
Systemic corticosteroids for radicular and non‐radicular low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012450.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roger Chou, Rafael Zambelli Pinto, Rongwei Fu, Robert A Lowe, Nicholas Henschke, James H McAuley, Tracy Dana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 16% |
| Spain | 5 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Serbia | 1 | 2% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 18% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#940,903
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,853
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,498
of 443,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.