↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Systemic corticosteroids for radicular and non‐radicular low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
45 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Systemic corticosteroids for radicular and non‐radicular low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012450.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger Chou, Rafael Zambelli Pinto, Rongwei Fu, Robert A Lowe, Nicholas Henschke, James H McAuley, Tracy Dana

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Unspecified 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 39 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Unspecified 5 6%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 43 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#953,135
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,778
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,590
of 445,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.