| Title |
Systemic corticosteroids for radicular and non‐radicular low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012450.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roger Chou, Rafael Zambelli Pinto, Rongwei Fu, Robert A Lowe, Nicholas Henschke, James H McAuley, Tracy Dana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 16% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 9% |
| Serbia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 43 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#952,717
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,780
of 13,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,614
of 444,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.