The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002779.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roddy McMillan, Heli Forssell, John AG Buchanan, Anne‐Marie Glenny, Jo C Weldon, Joanna M Zakrzewska |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 24% |
| Scientists | 9 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 523 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 522 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 84 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 12% |
| Researcher | 50 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 85 | 16% |
| Unknown | 177 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 170 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 6% |
| Psychology | 30 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 20 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 68 | 13% |
| Unknown | 187 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
#662,277
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,146
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,085
of 421,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.