↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Health policymakers’ views and experiences of knowledge translation approaches to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
Title
Health policymakers’ views and experiences of knowledge translation approaches to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015346
Authors

Bey-Marrié Schmidt, Sara Cooper, Irma Klerings, Karen Head, Kerstin Sell, Catherine Houghton, Ngcwalisa A Jama, Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Solange Mianda, Elaine Toomey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,371,956
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,210
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,479
of 388,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.