↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-biologic, steroid-sparing therapies for non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Non-biologic, steroid-sparing therapies for non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014831.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca G Edwards Mayhew, Tianjing Li, Paul McCann, Louis Leslie, Anne Strong Caldwell, Alan G Palestine

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 8 17%
Student > Master 4 8%
Unspecified 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 21 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 17%
Unspecified 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 23 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,042,903
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,507
of 12,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,661
of 444,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.