↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multiple versus single lumen umbilical venous catheters for newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Multiple versus single lumen umbilical venous catheters for newborn infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004498.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nandkishor S Kabra, Manoj Kumar, Sachin S Shah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 34 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 38 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,814
of 69,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.