↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multiple versus single lumen umbilical venous catheters for newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Multiple versus single lumen umbilical venous catheters for newborn infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004498.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nandkishor S Kabra, Manoj Kumar, Sachin S Shah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Other 14 11%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 32 25%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 43%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Unspecified 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 32 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,288,590
of 25,387,480 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,412
of 12,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,044
of 69,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.