↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multiple versus single lumen umbilical venous catheters for newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Multiple versus single lumen umbilical venous catheters for newborn infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004498.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nandkishor S Kabra, Manoj Kumar, Sachin S Shah

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Other 13 12%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 50%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Computer Science 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 22 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,305,659
of 22,579,714 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,050
of 12,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,039
of 58,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,579,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.